Local Activist Speaks Out Against US Loan Auditors

[Joann]

I noticed that Sandison and his wife did have some conclusion to whatever property they had that unlawful detainer filed on. Ther most logical conclusion is that they were evicted, because had they won the case, it would not be public record.

What is this about, did I miss something?

[AyatollahGondola]

I noticed that Sandison and his wife did have some conclusion to whatever property they had that unlawful detainer filed on. Ther most logical conclusion is that they were evicted, because had they won the case, it would not be public record.

[csc3325abn]

2 more victims Scammed By USLA

Thanks for your blog. My brother in law and I were scammed also. We both have a court date on 10/25/2010 @ 1:30 pm small claims court in Sacramento. I also talked to Disbarred attorney Dan Whaley and it was typical USLA B.S. I didn't know they HAVE BEEN CONVERTED-OUT so fyi to whoever is suing them.
Go to link: http://kepler.sos.ca.gov and verify agent of service before you sue in Small Claims Court. The new agent of service is:NATIONAL CORPORATE RESEARCH, LTD. for now. Heads up there hiding.

[AyatollahGondola]

US Loan Auditors on the receiving end of temporary injunction::

attatched below

THE COURT ORDERS, ADJUDICATES, AND DECREES THAT, pending
a trial on the merits and a determination in this action:
Defendant U.S. Loan Auditors, LLC (“Defendant”), and each of its officers,
agents, employees, representatives, and all persons acting in concert or participating
with them are enjoined and restrained from engaging in or performing directly or
indirectly any and all of the following acts:
a. Engaging in false or misleading advertising with respect to its loan
audit and related legal services and/or violating Lanham Act § 43(a);
b. Publishing commercial advertisements or solicitations falsely stating
or suggesting that BOA (and/or its affiliates) has engaged in predatory lending
practices, has violated federal law in connection with the loans it has originated, or
is the subject of a “predatory lending investigation”; and
c. Using any of Plaintiff’s marks in its commercial advertisements
and/or solicitations

[Steve]

Illegals buy Homes

Illegals were allowed to buy homes with their "Individual Taxpayer Identification Number" No Way!

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=essdmpsxBz4"]YouTube- American Home Mortgage Servicing Inc. helps Illegals buy homes[/ame] 15 min. video

[oaktown1]

I found the trust fund where my loan went.

Greenpoint mortgage funding trust Issuing Entity
mortgage pass through certificates series 2006-AR4

Master Servicer Aurora Loan Services
They didn't have it, when I spoke to them on 8/19/10

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc didn't they file bk? Oh that's right they did.

Greenpoint had .98% of the toxic loans
GMAC had 1.02% of the toxic loans, on 9/06 a certain % of the loans were turned over to gmac from greenpoint.

See gmac knew all along what they were getting involved with!!

[oaktown1]

I will call them tomorrow.

Thanks Steve I will give gmac a call and request the orginial docs and see what happens.

[Steve]

Original Docs.

oaktown,

Did you ever send a letter to the lender originator or servicer demanding all original mortgage signed documents? I've read this makes them quiet real quick.

[AyatollahGondola]

You have my sympathies over the Chp 13 Oaktown. I've been there. I ran a search last night, and on monday...that's one day mind you, over 700 BK's were filed in the eastern district court. Think we have a problem yet?
I'm not surprised that you're finding incomplete transactions that have been offered as the real deal to judges, and even less surprised that judges are accepting it, even though there are challenges. That's the way it seems to work now in the new banana republic we are sliding into. Keep fighting for your rights Oaktown. No one else will do it for you

[oaktown1]

We have 2 hearings for the bk 13 the 1st one is 8/31/10 gmac is trying to have the automatic stay removed. They 2nd one is 9/2/10 or 9/15/10 currently there are 2 bk cases right now. One of them is the meeting with the trustee and creditors. I went to a title company that had the same name then the previous one, I guess the previous employee’s are in jail, for their part. I was able to get the “Property History” for the house and it shows gmac in fact never did assigned the loan to them from greenpoint or indymac bank in 2006 and nothing else until 10/9/09 when gmac stole my property

[AyatollahGondola]

The poster named "wantmy$back" got most of her $ back from USLA

Through a small claims action, she met their rep Whaley in the hallway and agreed on sum that was around 2/3 of her losses to them. She said she got a check the next day.

Keep fighting out their kids.

[Steve]

Johnathan Stein

I called Johnathan Stein as soon as his named appeared on Complaints board (page 24). He said he could only tell me he use to have interaction with USLA but no longer. I filed with the DA, the AG, and then the BBB. Heck, I didn't know which state department was handling this. So, I covered all the bases. I'm surprised they wont provide the refunds. They knew they were not to collect upfront fees.

[AyatollahGondola]

Oaktown,

I think you saw what it takes to get their attention. Until then, I think you can expect the resistance to continue

[oaktown1]

USLA is still refusing to refund my money!!

Today I left a voice message for Gabe Thomas requesting my loan docs. At 05:00 I received a call back from Jeff Pulvino. He was concern that I was going to go pro bono in Federal court. I told Jeff my bk attorney was going to battle the bank for me. Which is more then USLA ever did for me. Other then just ripping us off. Jeff tried to tell me that we hired Jonathan Stein. I told Jeff no he was assigned to us by USLA. Jonathan's name appears on the US LOAN Auditors "Borrowers Signature Authorization" as in providing the Legal side of their scam buisness. All of the lawsuits look the same. This left Jeff speechless, he could not get out of this one. Then Jeff tells me he's not going to refund our money because in his silly mind they did what they were supposed to do. Which again was nothing except take our money. So today I filed a formal complaint with the bbb and will also follow up with the state bar. By the way Jeff I save everything. Jeff told me I should be going after Jonathan Stein. No Jeff you are wrong we did not pay Jonathan Stein a 1,000.00 a month we paid your stupid company. I was able to prevent someone else from getting ripped off by them. By telling them my sad story.

[AyatollahGondola]

Timothy O Connor appears to be backing out of cases involving loan companies en-masse. From todays court records:

Item 18 2010-00073308-CU-FR
Odilon Conejo vs. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage
Nature of Proceeding:
Filed By:
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
O'Connor, Timothy J.
Appearance required.


Item 19 2010-00073315-CU-FR
Linda Lambert Graves vs. Bac Home Loan Servicing
Nature of Proceeding:
Filed By:
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
O'Connor, Timothy J.
This matter is dropped from calendar

Item 22 2010-00074151-CU-FR
Maria Carla D. Keh vs. Bank of America Home Loans
Nature of Proceeding:
Filed By:
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
O'Connor, Timothy J.
The Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record is unopposed and is GRANTED.
Counsel has failed to include notice of the tentative ruling system in the notice of
motion in compliance with C.R.C., Rule 3.1308 and Local Rule 3.04(D). Counsel shall
make himself available for a telephonic appearance for oral argument, should his
clients fail to give proper notice.
The Court will sign the order submitted.


Item 23 2010-00076422-CU-FR
Oscar Byrd vs. Indymac Mortgage Services a division of Onewe
Nature of Proceeding:
Filed By:
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
O'Connor, Timothy J.
The Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record is unopposed and is GRANTED.
Counsel has failed to include notice of the tentative ruling system in the notice of
motion in compliance with C.R.C., Rule 3.1308 and Local Rule 3.04(D). Counsel shall
make himself available for a telephonic appearance for oral argument, should his
clients fail to give proper notice.
The Court will sign the order submitted.

2010-00073653-CU-FR
THOMAS P. TRAVIS VS. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, ET AL
Nature of Proceeding:
Filed By:
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
O'Connor, Timothy J.
The motion to withdraw as counsel of record is UNOPPOSED and is GRANTED.
The Court will sign the proposed order which was submitted with the moving papers.

2010-00076533-CU-FR
ALFONSO HERRERA VS. AMERICA'S SERVICING COMPANY
Nature of Proceeding:
Filed By:
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
O'Connor, Timothy J.
The motion to withdraw as counsel of record is UNOPPOSED and is GRANTED.
The Court will sign the proposed order which was submitted with the moving papers.
Moving counsel is admonished because the notice of motion does not provide the
correct address for Dept. 54. Moving counsel is directed to contact his/her client
forthwith and advise client of the correct address for Dept. 54. If moving counsel is
unable to contact client prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the
hearing in person or by telephone.


Item 19 2010-00076823-CU-FR
JOSE HERRERA VS. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, ET AL
Nature of Proceeding:
Filed By:
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
O'Connor, Timothy J.
The motion to withdraw as counsel of record is UNOPPOSED and is GRANTED.
The Court will sign the proposed order which was submitted with the moving papers.
Moving counsel is admonished because the notice of motion does not provide the
correct address for Dept. 54. Moving counsel is directed to contact his/her client
forthwith and advise client of the correct address for Dept. 54. If moving counsel is
unable to contact client prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the
hearing in person or by telephone.

2010-00079817-CU-FR
FRANK ARREDONDO VS. BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS
Nature of Proceeding:
Filed By:
Motion to Withdraw as Counsel
O'Connor, Timothy J.
The motion to withdraw as counsel of record is UNOPPOSED and is GRANTED.
The Court will sign the proposed order which was submitted with the moving papers.
Moving counsel is admonished because the notice of motion does not provide the
correct address for Dept. 54. Moving counsel is directed to contact his/her client
forthwith and advise client of the correct address for Dept. 54. If moving counsel is
unable to contact client prior to hearing, moving counsel is ordered to appear at the
hearing in person or by telephone.