Hello. I am a prosecutor for the Contractors State License Board. If you have any information as to any unprofessional business practices by Mr. Bixby, please contact me. If you know of any court judgments against Mr. Bixby, please identify the court case, case number, and county. Thank you.
Jeffrey M. Phillips
Deputy Attorney General
California Department of Justice
Sacramento, California
Mailing Address:
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
(916) 324-6292 - Telephone
(916) 327-8643 - Fax. [email protected] -email
Hello. I am a prosecutor for the Contractors State License Board. If you have any information as to any unprofessional business practices by Mr. Bixby, please contact me. If you know of any court judgments against Mr. Bixby, please identify the court case, case number, and county. Thank you.
Jeffrey M. Phillips
Deputy Attorney General
California Department of Justice
Sacramento, California
Mailing Address:
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
(916) 324-6292 - Telephone
(916) 327-8643 - Fax. [email protected] -email
Since my last post, Mark has been involved in at least 5 other lawsuits. three of them have been referred to the California attorney general for legal action. The latest one though might be quite important for anyone who is considering entering into any written contract with Mark Bixby. In that lawsuit, Mark is publicly stating that he is not able to understand written contracts, even if he reads them. How do you think he will plead when his contract with you is breeched?
Here's is one of many excerpts stating this claim:
Case number in Sacramento superior court
34-2011-0010-5289
"Plaintiff Mark also has a learning disability that makes it difficult to read and
comprehend wntten material. His learning disability is so severe that he can
read something several times, but he still cannot comprehend what he is
reading. For most important transactions. Plaintiff has an attomey present to
explain all the terms"
Now bear in mind, that mark is a contractor. Most contracts are written, although oral contracts also exist, but...a contractor in California is required to have written contracts with his customers. Would this inspire you to have a contract with him?? If you do, I'd demand that he has his lawyer review it first, and sign it along with him, lest he claim that he did not understand it later when he sues you, or you sue him
I don't know what the number he's at right now, but it's 60 plus at this point. Looks the same as so many others:
Bixby signs contract....
bixby takes too long to get the job done or performs poorly
After a year or so, customers stops paying or throws bixby off the property
Bixby plays wounded dove and cries to attorney
Bixby files lawsuits, leins, and turns into a mad dog.
Christ, I feel for these poor people.
From the looks of this one so far, Bixby has been on the job for 11 months.
Interestingly, when I looked at the correspondence from Bixby to the Relat's when he was failing them, he stated he didn't do residential work any more.
Here's the definitive way to find out whether you can trust MJB Bixby... go to Sac Superior online and search their case filings. You'll see that Bixby is extremely litigious.
Want to dig further, go down and check out the most recent cases. Its all there. The CSLB is filled with contractors and as such, it can't be trusted to police its own. Its set up to give the contractor every break you could imagine.
Do your own research. Go here and look at how many times he has sued others. Suing his clients is apparently a hobby for Mr. Bixby.
https://services.saccourt.com/indexsearchnew/
Almost every claim is a year or more out when a person files one against a contractor. Most people having problems with a contractor need help now. CSLB's main task is pointed ly getting contractors into the system. By that, I mean getting geting them licensed. They seem ill equipped to handle the litigation of people like Bixby, unless you push them very, very hard, or there is a big public issue like that pool company a couple years ago.
Unfortunately, public records of CSLB are pretty restricted.
Here's the definitive way to find out whether you can trust MJB Bixby... go to Sac Superior online and search their case filings. You'll see that Bixby is extremely litigious.
Want to dig further, go down and check out the most recent cases. Its all there. The CSLB is filled with contractors and as such, it can't be trusted to police its own. Its set up to give the contractor every break you could imagine.
Do your own research. Go here and look at how many times he has sued others. Suing his clients is apparently a hobby for Mr. Bixby.
https://services.saccourt.com/indexsearchnew/
Actually, you can find more of his activities on this website:
MJB Bixby - Crook or Innocent? Search the court records to find out.
Here's the definitive way to find out whether you can trust MJB Bixby... go to Sac Superior online and search their case filings. You'll see that Bixby is extremely litigious.
Want to dig further, go down and check out the most recent cases. Its all there. The CSLB is filled with contractors and as such, it can't be trusted to police its own. Its set up to give the contractor every break you could imagine.
Do your own research. Go here and look at how many times he has sued others. Suing his clients is apparently a hobby for Mr. Bixby.
Actually, the count is around 25 for civil, around 30 more for small claims, and then there's unlawful detainer court that has 7 or so more. Each week, more of them are uploaded to this website below
I hired MJB Bixby and it was a nightmare. Bixby can be beaten and has been a few times, but its best to avoid him. The guy is friendly and slick when writing the contract. But he is there to get your money, not do the job right. He thrives on bullying and pursuing others and actually seems to enjoy litigation.
The contractors board is run by contractors and mired in rules that give them every chance to protect their buddies' licenses. As a result, his record was spotless when we hired him and even after the complaints we and others filed. You can't trust their records.
If you want an indicator of whether this guy is trouble, search Sacramento courts online case listing at the link below. By my count, 16 civil cases since 2001. I think that's an obvious warning to anyone thinking of hiring him.
It also includes a permanent restraining order for the plaintiffs family; The wife, and kids?. This also, without the taking of any evidence, nor an admission of guilt? Now who would agree to such a thing under normal circumstances? Why would a plaintiff in a case even ask for such a far reaching protective order in the settlement?
The injunction was agreed to without a trial, without taking any evidence, and without any admission of liability or wrongdoing to settle the litigation. It is not evidence of any misconduct and shall not be treated as an admission of liability by any party for any purpose.
On the other hand, "AyatollahGondola" is Davi Rodrigues who sued Mr. Bixby and lost. Mr. Bixby sued Mr. Rodrigues and has a judgment against him in excess of $105,000, for breach of lease. Mr. Rodrigues’ motivation is obvious.
First off, it is still a permanent injunction. Secondly, just because it was agreed to without the taking of evidence does not mean there wasn't any. There was in fact, lots of evidence. Or should I say, there is lots of evidence? It's all still available, and the court retains jurisdiction.
And as far as it not being treated as an admission of liability, I noticed that Bixby neither admitted nor denied the allegations.
Regardless of my motivation, these things are fact:
The injunction is in effect
The injunction is permanent and forever
The injunction is a public document
To align the thread and my posts in a more appropriate fashion to the boards mission, I will post the evidence in the original case from both sides, and the story that might show a clear pathway towards an example the rest of us may follow when our government and the peripheral governing bodies connected to it do not protect and serve the public.
This is meant to be a direct testimonial to the malfeasance of the California state Contractors license board, the Attorney Generals office, and the local district attorney here in Sacramento. From start to finish, the highlights of the case...including the evidence alleged, the methods employed, and the results that followed.
Your justifications for this posting are not quite in line with your initial presentation. If this uploaded file is only part of the case, and it was meant to educate the rest of the board as you say, then a proper introduction would have been appropriate first. Just posting the file first is a little confusing to say the least. The upload will be removed soon , however the thread can remain for a few days to allow you time to clarify it if you still want to.
Welcome TrueBlue and Big Cheese!,
I see you both have strong opinions. And they are your opinions. Please review the forum rules.
Leave a comment: