....STOP SMUD FROM SPENDING RATEPAYER MONEY ON SCIENCE CENTER BUILDING NAMING RIGHTS.......SEE THE LOCAL FOCUS CAMPAIGN SECTION.....

Go Back   Fight Back In Sac > Main Category > General Discussion
Register FAQForum Rules Members List Calendar Articles Media Center Downloads Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

General Discussion This forum is for a wide range of topics that do not fit in the other categories


Welcome to the Fight Back In Sac forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-22-2007, 09:11 AM
AyatollahGondola's Avatar
AyatollahGondola AyatollahGondola is offline
Soldier
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,316
Default MJB/Bixby Construction Co

This company has a permanent injunction and permanent restraining order you may download from this post
Attached Files
File Type: zip MJBBixbyinjunction.zip (2.97 MB, 481 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-10-2007, 01:53 PM
Zack Zack is offline
New Registrant
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2
Default

The injunction was agreed to without a trial, without taking any evidence, and without any admission of liability or wrongdoing to settle the litigation. It is not evidence of any misconduct and shall not be treated as an admission of liability by any party for any purpose.
On the other hand, "AyatollahGondola" is Davi Rodrigues who sued Mr. Bixby and lost. Mr. Bixby sued Mr. Rodrigues and has a judgment against him in excess of $105,000, for breach of lease. Mr. Rodrigues’ motivation is obvious.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-10-2007, 07:47 PM
Referee Referee is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 34
Default

Zack and Ayatollah,

Please read the forum rules. One specifically prohibits using the forum to engage in a private war with another registrant.

Ayatollah,

This download was originally posted in the Report fraud and corruption forum, but that is designated for public officials, politicians, and related. It was moved into general discussion for lack of a better forum. This thread and the attached file are going to be reviewed by other moderators and/or the administrators for its' value to Fight Back in Sac. Unless there is some substantial link to public government here, it may be removed.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-10-2007, 09:01 PM
True Blue True Blue is offline
New Registrant
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1
Thumbs down Mark Bixby/ MJB Construction is still a crook

No matter what Zack says, this guy is an itimidating, liar and a crook.
He will take advantage of you at ANY cost.

He prays on the elderly and the weak.
He has the court system down to a science.
The reason there was no trial is because he would have had to admit guilt. This was his way of avoiding that.

If you would like to KNOW if he is lying, just look at his lips. If they are moving, he is lying.

Stay clear of this dude!
( Unless of course you have a ton of money to lose and throw away)

True Blue
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-10-2007, 11:47 PM
big_cheez big_cheez is offline
New Registrant
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1
Default

Zak

Sorry, nice try.
I don't know the case personaly but here's my take on it.

Bixby's attorney told him to take the stipulation, Why? Because if Bixby lost the case, which apprently there was a good chance he was going to loose otherwise he would have fought it, then Bixby would be liable for the defendants attorney fees, court costs, damages, etc, maybe even criminal procedings. This way his wrongdoing slips into oblivion.

I don't know Davi's situation but I do know Bixby. He is vindictive. If he thinks you crossed him or if he can get away with it, he will spend thousands to hound you. Thats just the way he is.

How do I know Bixby, you guessed it, I used to work for him. He's come after me too.
I have been in construction 30 years. I have been a superintendent since early 90s. In all my years, I have never worked for anyone like Bixby. Not one project I worked on was the client happy. My first project for him was heading for litigation before I even started with the company.

To everyone else reading this ... do yourself a favor, before contracting with Bixby, ask for a list of 10 happy clients you can contact as references. If he does come up with 10, check them very carefully.

Last edited by big_cheez : 09-10-2007 at 11:50 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-11-2007, 01:47 AM
AyatollahGondola's Avatar
AyatollahGondola AyatollahGondola is offline
Soldier
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,316
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Referee View Post
Zack and Ayatollah,

Please read the forum rules. One specifically prohibits using the forum to engage in a private war with another registrant.

Ayatollah,

This download was originally posted in the Report fraud and corruption forum, but that is designated for public officials, politicians, and related. It was moved into general discussion for lack of a better forum. This thread and the attached file are going to be reviewed by other moderators and/or the administrators for its' value to Fight Back in Sac. Unless there is some substantial link to public government here, it may be removed.
I can show a link. Fightbackinsac's introduction:

Quote:
Fight Back in Sac was created as a meeting place for those who seek empowerment, information, and allies to aid in the battle against corruption, malfeasance, and fraud that occurs in our government.
This injunction is a small part of a larger case that was brought by a couple who obviously did not get help from city, county, and state authorities. They sued on their own, and upon winning, or settling if you prefer Zack, they thought about the rest of us rather than just themselves. Read the settlement and you'll see that it was brought in the interests and for the protection of the general public. Many of us have been there too. You can't get the authorities to act, so nothing gets done about it. These folks did it themselves. There's a lesson in there for all of us here. An example if you will...They did the work that a DA or an AG should have done.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-12-2007, 12:18 AM
Referee Referee is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 34
Default

Ayatollah,

Your justifications for this posting are not quite in line with your initial presentation. If this uploaded file is only part of the case, and it was meant to educate the rest of the board as you say, then a proper introduction would have been appropriate first. Just posting the file first is a little confusing to say the least. The upload will be removed soon , however the thread can remain for a few days to allow you time to clarify it if you still want to.

Welcome TrueBlue and Big Cheese!,

I see you both have strong opinions. And they are your opinions. Please review the forum rules.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-20-2007, 04:20 PM
Zack Zack is offline
New Registrant
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2
Default

Hey Big Cheese, if not one job you worked on was the client happy, maybe the problem was you.

Last edited by Zack : 09-20-2007 at 04:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-27-2007, 09:13 AM
AyatollahGondola's Avatar
AyatollahGondola AyatollahGondola is offline
Soldier
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,316
Default

To align the thread and my posts in a more appropriate fashion to the boards mission, I will post the evidence in the original case from both sides, and the story that might show a clear pathway towards an example the rest of us may follow when our government and the peripheral governing bodies connected to it do not protect and serve the public.
This is meant to be a direct testimonial to the malfeasance of the California state Contractors license board, the Attorney Generals office, and the local district attorney here in Sacramento. From start to finish, the highlights of the case...including the evidence alleged, the methods employed, and the results that followed.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-16-2007, 02:53 AM
AyatollahGondola's Avatar
AyatollahGondola AyatollahGondola is offline
Soldier
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,316
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zack View Post
The injunction was agreed to without a trial, without taking any evidence, and without any admission of liability or wrongdoing to settle the litigation. It is not evidence of any misconduct and shall not be treated as an admission of liability by any party for any purpose.
On the other hand, "AyatollahGondola" is Davi Rodrigues who sued Mr. Bixby and lost. Mr. Bixby sued Mr. Rodrigues and has a judgment against him in excess of $105,000, for breach of lease. Mr. Rodrigues’ motivation is obvious.
First off, it is still a permanent injunction. Secondly, just because it was agreed to without the taking of evidence does not mean there wasn't any. There was in fact, lots of evidence. Or should I say, there is lots of evidence? It's all still available, and the court retains jurisdiction.
And as far as it not being treated as an admission of liability, I noticed that Bixby neither admitted nor denied the allegations.
Regardless of my motivation, these things are fact:
The injunction is in effect
The injunction is permanent and forever
The injunction is a public document
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.